People v Andrew Goldstein
Annotate this Case
People v Goldstein
2004 NYSlipOp 08788
Decided on November 30, 2004
Appellate Division, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.
Decided on November 30, 2004
Nardelli, J.P., Tom, Ellerin, Williams, JJ.
3677& M-1594
[*1]The People of the State of New York, Respondent,
v
Andrew Goldstein, Defendant-Appellant.
Ind. 527/99Andrew C. Fine and Laura R. Johnson, The Legal
Aid Society, New York (Natalie Rea of counsel), for appellant.
Robert M. Morgenthau, District Attorney, New York (Morrie I.
Kleinbart of counsel), for respondent.
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Carol
Berkman, J.), rendered May 4, 2000, affirmed. People's motion
seeking leave to file a sur reply addressing issues raised by Crawford v
Washington (__ US __, 124 S Ct 1354 [2004]) granted.
Opinion by Williams, J. All concur.
Decided on November 30, 2004
Nardelli, J.P., Tom, Ellerin, Williams, JJ.
3677& M-1594
[*1]The People of the State of New York, Respondent,
v
Andrew Goldstein, Defendant-Appellant.
Ind. 527/99Andrew C. Fine and Laura R. Johnson, The Legal
Aid Society, New York (Natalie Rea of counsel), for appellant.
Robert M. Morgenthau, District Attorney, New York (Morrie I.
Kleinbart of counsel), for respondent.
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Carol
Berkman, J.), rendered May 4, 2000, affirmed. People's motion
seeking leave to file a sur reply addressing issues raised by Crawford v
Washington (__ US __, 124 S Ct 1354 [2004]) granted.
Opinion by Williams, J. All concur.
Order filed.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
