Matter of Murray M. Murad v City of New York

Annotate this Case
Matter of Murad v City of New York 2004 NY Slip Op 07967 [12 AD3d 193] November 9, 2004 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, January 19, 2005

In the Matter of Murray M. Murad, Appellant,
v
City of New York et al., Respondents.

—[*1]

Judgment (denominated an order), Supreme Court, New York County (William A. Wetzel, J.), entered May 23, 2003, which dismissed the petition brought pursuant to CPLR article 78 seeking to compel renewal of a handgun carry permit, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The Police Commissioner's revision of the handgun licensing regulations (38 RCNY 5-01), which eliminated the special category of permits for transporting a gun to a target range, was neither arbitrary nor capricious, and was a rational and proper exercise of authority (see Matter of Consolation Nursing Home v Commissioner of N.Y. State Dept. of Health, 85 NY2d 326, 331 [1995]). Regulation of the number of firearms within the City is a rational means of promoting the safety and welfare of city residents and visitors (Matter of Caruso v Ward, 160 AD2d 540 [1990], lv denied 76 NY2d 706 [1990]). Concur—Tom, J.P., Andrias, Sullivan, Ellerin and Sweeny, JJ.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.