Howard Gitman v Susan Gitman

Annotate this Case
Gitman v Gitman 2004 NY Slip Op 05387 [8 AD3d 166] June 22, 2004 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, August 25, 2004

Howard Gitman, Appellant,
v
Susan Gitman, Respondent.

—[*1]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Beverly Cohen, J.H.O.), entered June 6, 2003, inter alia, awarding defendant exclusive possession and title of the marital residence and allocating marital debt equally between the parties, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

The award is amply supported by the record. The parties' other liabilities were entirely marital in nature and incurred as a result of jointly made investment decisions that benefitted plaintiff as much as defendant (see Barnes v Barnes, 106 AD2d 535 [1984]; Savage v Savage, 155 AD2d 336 [1989]). No basis exists to disturb the Judicial Hearing Officer's findings of credibility. We have considered plaintiff's other arguments and find them unavailing. Concur—Nardelli, J.P., Mazzarelli, Andrias, Gonzalez and Sweeny, JJ.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.