Svetlana Tikhonova v Ford Motor Company
Annotate this Case
Tikhonova v Ford Motor Co.
2004 NYSlipOp 05361
Decided on June 22, 2004
Appellate Division, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.
Decided on June 22, 2004
Saxe, J.P., Williams, Lerner, Marlow, JJ.
3407
[*1]Svetlana Tikhonova, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v
Ford Motor Company, et al., Defendants-Respondents, Car Corp. Inc., et al., Defendants.
Pollack, Pollack, Isaac & DeCicco, New York (Brian J. Isaac of
counsel), for appellant.
Nixon Peabody, LLP, Garden City (Santo Borruso of counsel),
for respondents.
Decided on June 22, 2004
Saxe, J.P., Williams, Lerner, Marlow, JJ.
3407
[*1]Svetlana Tikhonova, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v
Ford Motor Company, et al., Defendants-Respondents, Car Corp. Inc., et al., Defendants.
Pollack, Pollack, Isaac & DeCicco, New York (Brian J. Isaac of
counsel), for appellant.
Nixon Peabody, LLP, Garden City (Santo Borruso of counsel),
for respondents.
Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Douglas E. McKeon, J.), entered March 10, 2003, reversed, on the law, without costs, defendants-respondents' motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as against them denied and the complaint reinstated.
Opinion by Saxe, J.P. All concur except Williams, J. who dissents in an Opinion.
Order filed.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
