Zipporah Feder v Staten Island Hospital

Annotate this Case
Feder v Staten Is. Hosp. 2004 NY Slip Op 05356 [8 AD3d 141] June 17, 2004 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, August 25, 2004

Zipporah Feder et al., Appellants,
v
Staten Island Hospital et al., Respondents, et al., Defendant.

—[*1]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Leland DeGrasse, J.), entered July 23, 2003, which, in a putative class action involving defendants' alleged overcharges for copies of medical records, upon this Court's order reversing an order that certified plaintiffs as a class and appointed a Special Referee to supervise disclosure (304 AD2d 470 [2003]), terminated the reference, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court properly terminated the reference to supervise disclosure on the ground that this Court's reversal of the class certification order eliminated any need for class-related disclosure and thus any need for supervision. The motion court correctly interpreted such reversal to be without leave to seek a recertification of the class upon completion of additional disclosure (compare e.g. Brandon v Chefetz, 106 AD2d 162, 171-172 [1985], and Katz v NVF Co., 100 AD2d 470, [*2]476 [1984], with e.g. Hazelhurst v Brita Prods. Co., 295 AD2d 240, 241-242, 243 [2002]). We have considered and rejected plaintiffs' other arguments. Concur—Saxe, J.P., Sullivan, Williams, Friedman and Marlow, JJ.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.