Coty Inc. v Anchor Construction

Annotate this Case
Coty Inc. v Anchor Constr. 2004 NY Slip Op 04112 [7 AD3d 438] May 25, 2004 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, July 28, 2004

Coty Inc., Appellant,
v
Anchor Construction, Inc., Respondent.

—[*1]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (James A. Yates, J.), entered January 28, 2003, which, inter alia, granted respondent's cross motion to vacate the arbitration award against it and remanded the matter for a new arbitration before a new panel of arbitrators, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

The arbitration award against respondent was properly vacated in light of the appearance of impropriety created by the involvement of the arbitrators in the parties' dispute over prepayment of arbitration fees, a matter in which the arbitrators had a direct financial interest (see Matter of Grendi v LNL Constr. Mgt. Corp., 175 AD2d 775 [1991]; see also Matter of Catalyst Waste-to-Energy Corp. of Long Beach [City of Long Beach], 164 AD2d 817 [1990], appeal dismissed 76 NY2d 1017 [1990]). Concur—Tom, J.P., Mazzarelli, Saxe and Marlow, JJ.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.