Carl Levine v Laurette Angsten

Annotate this Case
Levine v Angsten 2004 NY Slip Op 03063 [6 AD3d 340] April 27, 2004 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, June 30, 2004

Carl Levine, Appellant,
v
Laurette Angsten et al., Respondents.

—[*1]

Appeal from order, Supreme Court, New York County (Charles E. Ramos, J.), entered December 12, 2002, to the extent that it directed plaintiff's counsel to pay defendant's counsel $1,400 for failing to comply with a prior order, unanimously dismissed, without costs.

The order challenged herein merely quantified a $50-per-day sanction previously imposed on May 28, 2002, in the event of failure to deliver certain deposition transcripts. Plaintiff is not aggrieved by such a monetary imposition on his attorney (Warm v State of New York, 265 AD2d 546, 547 [1999]; see also Scopelliti v Town of New Castle, 92 NY2d 944 [1998]). Concur—Nardelli, J.P., Saxe, Sullivan and Gonzalez, JJ.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.