Nesher, LLC v Realm National Insurance Company

Annotate this Case
Nesher, LLC v Realm Natl. Ins. Co. 2004 NY Slip Op 02836 [6 AD3d 242] April 15, 2004 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, June 30, 2004

Nesher, LLC, as General Partner of Kinder Investments, L.P., Appellant,
v
Realm National Insurance Company, Respondent.

—[*1]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Barbara R. Kapnick, J.), entered October 8, 2003, which denied plaintiff's motion for summary judgment, and granted defendant's cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

The phrase in the policy to "do your best" is unambiguous, and has a clear and unmistakable meaning (see Goldman & Sons v Hanover Ins. Co., 80 NY2d 986 [1992]). The undisputed evidence establishes that plaintiff failed to purchase oil for the heating tank or to contract with an oil supplier for the premises during the 18 months from its acquisition of the premises until the water damage resulting from the frozen pipes. In addition, plaintiff's caretaker was not instructed on how to maintain the heat, and was never even told that the premises were heated with oil, how to check for oil in the tank, or where the oil tank was located. Under any reasonable interpretation, plaintiff failed to "do [its] best" to maintain heat in the building. Concur—Buckley, P.J., Tom, Sullivan and Williams, JJ.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.