People v Jose Pena

Annotate this Case
People v Pena 2003 NY Slip Op 19550 [1 AD3d 1063] December 16, 2003 Appellate Division, First Department As corrected through Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, February 25, 2004

The People of the State of New York, Respondent,
v
Jose Pena, Appellant.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (John Bradley, J.), rendered November 21, 2000, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third and fourth degrees, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to concurrent terms of 4½ to 9 years and 3 to 6 years, respectively, unanimously affirmed.

The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. There is no basis for disturbing the jury's determinations concerning credibility. There was ample evidence of possession of drugs with intent to sell, including the officers' observation of defendant exchanging an object for money, the drugs recovered from defendant's person, and the manner in which the drugs were packaged (see People v Ranson, 251 AD2d 263 [1998], lv denied 92 NY2d 985 [1998]). We have considered and rejected defendant's remaining arguments, including those contained in his pro se supplemental brief. Concur—Buckley, P.J., Nardelli, Tom, Mazzarelli and Sullivan, JJ.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.