Matter of Ann B. v William B.

Annotate this Case
Matter of Ann B. v William B. 2003 NY Slip Op 18524 [1 AD3d 243] November 20, 2003 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, January 28, 2004

In the Matter of Ann B., Respondent,
v
William B., Appellant.

— Order, Family Court, New York County (Jody Adams, J.), entered on or about April 20, 2001, which denied respondent father's objections to a modified order of support dated January 16, 2001, which, upon remand for recalculation, increased his child support obligation for the parties' 16-year-old daughter from $410.50 per month to $299.94 bi-weekly, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Contrary to respondent's argument, the upward modification of his child support obligation sought by petitioner was not precluded by the parties' several-year-old agreement establishing his child support obligation at a level lower than it would be if set pursuant to the Child Support Standards Act (CSSA) guidelines (see Matter of Tompkins County Support Collection Unit v Chamberlin, 99 NY2d 328, 337 [2003]). Nor did any failure by petitioner to specify unanticipated circumstances warranting upward modification preclude the relief, given the presumptively deficient prevailing level of child support (see Matter of Brescia v Fitts, 56 NY2d 132 [1982]).

We have considered respondent's remaining arguments and find them unavailing. Concur—Buckley, P.J., Rosenberger, Ellerin, Williams and Gonzalez, JJ.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.