State v. Managan (Unpublished Opinion)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

This decision of the New Mexico Court of Appeals was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Refer to Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished decisions. Electronic decisions may contain computergenerated errors or other deviations from the official version filed by the Court of Appeals. IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO No. A-1-CA-38572 STATE OF NEW MEXICO, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ISAAC PAUL MANAGAN, Defendant-Appellant. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF DOÑA ANA COUNTY Douglas R. Driggers, District Judge Hector H. Balderas, Attorney General Santa Fe, NM for Appellee Isaac Paul Managan El Paso, TX Pro Se Appellant MEMORANDUM OPINION DUFFY, Judge. {1} Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed summary disposition and amended proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed and the time for doing so has expired. AFFIRMED. {2} IT IS SO ORDERED. MEGAN P. DUFFY, Judge WE CONCUR: ZACHARY A. IVES, Judge JANE B. YOHALEM, Judge

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.