Khalsa v. Rose L. Brand & Assoc. (Unpublished Opinion)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

This decision of the New Mexico Court of Appeals was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Refer to Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished decisions. Electronic decisions may contain computergenerated errors or other deviations from the official version filed by the Court of Appeals. IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO No. A-1-CA-39355 MUKHTIAR KHALSA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ROSE L. BRAND & ASSOCIATES, P.C.; HOUSER & ALLISON, a Professional Corporation; JOHNSON LAW FIRM, L.C.; KAREN HOWDEN WEAVER; KERRI L. ALLENSWORTH; ANDREW P. YARRINGTON; THOMAS L. JOHNSON; and LINDSAY K. GRIFFEL, Defendants-Appellees. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF SANTA FE COUNTY Kathleen A. McGarry, District Judge Mukhtiar Khalsa Santa Cruz, NM Pro Se Appellant Rose L. Brand & Associates, P.C. Eraina Edwards Albuquerque, NM for Appellees Rose L. Brand & Associates, P.C., Houser & Allison, Karen Howden Weaver, Kerri L. Allensworth, Andrew P. Yarrington, and Lindsay K. Griffel Johnson Law Firm, L.C. Dennis W. Hill Albuquerque, NM for Appellees Johnson Law Firm, L.C. and Thomas L. Johnson MEMORANDUM OPINION BOGARDUS, Judge. {1} Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed, and the time for doing so has expired. AFFIRMED. {2} IT IS SO ORDERED. KRISTINA BOGARDUS, Judge WE CONCUR: JENNIFER L. ATTREP, Judge MEGAN P. DUFFY, Judge

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.