State v. Cooksey (Unpublished Opinion)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
This decision of the New Mexico Court of Appeals was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Refer to Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished decisions. Electronic decisions may contain computergenerated errors or other deviations from the official version filed by the Court of Appeals. IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO No. A-1-CA-39224 STATE OF NEW MEXICO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. RONALD COOKSEY, Defendant-Appellee. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF OTERO COUNTY Steven Blankinship, District Judge Hector H. Balderas, Attorney General Maris Veidemanis, Assistant Attorney General Santa Fe, NM for Appellant Bennett J. Baur, Chief Public Defender Santa Fe, NM Dayna Louise Jones, Assistant Public Defender Alamogordo, NM for Appellee MEMORANDUM OPINION HANISEE, Chief Judge. {1} The State appeals from the district court’s order dismissing the case for a speedy trial violation. After remanding for further findings from the district court and considering those findings, we entered a notice of proposed disposition, proposing to affirm. The State filed a response stating that “after due consideration it will not be filing a memorandum in opposition to the Court’s calendar notice.” [MIO 1] {2} Accordingly, and for the reasons stated in our notice of proposed disposition, we affirm. {3} IT IS SO ORDERED. J. MILES HANISEE, Chief Judge WE CONCUR: BRIANA H. ZAMORA, Judge SHAMMARA H. HENDERSON, Judge
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
