State v. Jackson (Unpublished Opinion)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
This decision of the New Mexico Court of Appeals was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Refer to Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished decisions. Electronic decisions may contain computergenerated errors or other deviations from the official version filed by the Court of Appeals. IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO No. A-1-CA-38553 STATE OF NEW MEXICO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BRIAN JACKSON, Defendant-Appellee. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF SANDOVAL COUNTY Louis P. McDonald, District Judge Hector H. Balderas, Attorney General Santa Fe, NM Charles J. Gutierrez, Assistant Attorney General Albuquerque, NM for Appellant Arthur Hernandez Rio Rancho, NM for Appellee MEMORANDUM OPINION HANISEE, Chief Judge. {1} The State appeals from the district court’s order granting Defendant’s motion to suppress an officer’s testimony. This Court issued a notice of proposed disposition, proposing to summarily affirm. The State filed a notice of non-opposition to our calendar notice, stating that it does not oppose the proposed summary disposition. Accordingly, and for the reasons stated in our notice of proposed disposition, we affirm. {2} IT IS SO ORDERED. J. MILES HANISEE, Chief Judge WE CONCUR: KRISTINA BOGARDUS, Judge BRIANA H. ZAMORA, Judge
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
