US Bank National Association v. Slade

Annotate this Case
Download PDF
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date. 1 2 3 4 5 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee for WASHINGTON MUTUAL MSC MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2003-SS, 6 Plaintiff-Appellee, 7 v. 8 9 10 11 NO. A-1-CA-37082 DAVID W. SLADE, Individually and as Co-Trustee of the SLADE FAMILY TRUST, UNDER TRUST AGREEMENT DATED OCTOBER 12, 2004, 12 Defendant-Appellant, 13 and 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 DANA SLADE a/k/a DANA VANLYSSEL SLADE a/k/a DANA M. SLADE a/k/a DANA MARIE SLADE a/k/a DANA VANLYSSEL-SLADE, Individually and as Co-Trustee of the SLADE FAMILY TRUST, UNDER TRUST AGREEMENT DATED OCTOBER 12, 2004; UNKNOWN SPOUSE OF DANA SLADE a/k/a DANA VANLYSSEL SLADE a/k/a DANA M. SLADE a/k/a DANA MARIE SLADE a/k/a DANA VANLYSSEL-SLADE; BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.; WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.; OCCUPANTS OF THE PROPERTY, Defendants. 1 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF SANDOVAL COUNTY 2 John F. Davis, District Judge 3 Hinkle Shanor LLC 4 Nancy Svoboda Cusack 5 Santa Fe, NM 6 for Appellee 7 David W. Slade 8 Placitas, NM 9 Pro Se Appellant 10 MEMORANDUM OPINION 11 VANZI, Chief Judge. 12 {1} Summary dismissal was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of 13 proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary dismissal has 14 been filed and the time for doing so has expired. 15 {2} DISMISSED. 16 {3} IT IS SO ORDERED. 17 18 _______________________________ LINDA M. VANZI, Chief Judge 19 WE CONCUR: 20 ___________________________________ 21 MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge 2 1 _________________________________ 2 JULIE J. VARGAS, Judge 3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.