State v. Smith III

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date. 1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO 2 STATE OF NEW MEXICO 3 Plaintiff-Appellee, 4 v. NO. A-1-CA-36899 5 WILLIAM E. SMITH III, 6 Defendant-Appellant. 7 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF SANDOVAL COUNTY 8 George P. Eichwald, District Judge 9 Hector H. Balderas, Attorney General 10 Santa Fe, NM 11 for Appellee 12 William E. Smith III 13 Rio Rancho, NM 14 Pro Se Appellant 15 16 HANISEE, Judge. MEMORANDUM OPINION 1 {1} Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of 2 proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has 3 been filed and the time for doing so has expired. 4 {2} AFFIRMED. 5 {3} IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 7 _______________________________ J. MILES HANISEE, Judge 8 WE CONCUR: 9 _________________________________ 10 EMIL J. KIEHNE Judge 11 _________________________________ 12 JENNIFER L. ATTREP, Judge 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.