Heemsbergen v. Givan
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date. 1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO 2 ANNA LEE HEEMSBERGEN, 3 Plaintiff-Appellee, 4 v. No. A-1-CA-36834 5 JOHN GIVAN, 6 Defendant-Appellant, 7 and 8 REBAL GIVAN, 9 Defendant. 10 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF HIDALGO COUNTY 11 J.C. Robinson, District Judge 12 Anna Lee Heemsbergen 13 Lordsburg, NM 14 Pro Se Appellee 15 John Givan 16 Lordsburg, NM 17 Pro Se Appellant 18 MEMORANDUM OPINION 1 ZAMORA, Judge. 2 {1} Defendant appeals the district court’s adverse decision in this case. We issued 3 a notice of proposed summary disposition proposing to affirm. That notice was mailed 4 to the address provided to this Court by Defendant. We then issued an amended notice 5 and mailed that notice to the same address. Both mailings were returned to this Court 6 unopened. We note that it is Defendant’s responsibility to provide this Court with a 7 proper address where he may be served with notices and other documents issued by 8 this Court. The time for filing a memorandum in opposition to our notices of proposed 9 summary disposition has expired. Therefore, for the reasons stated in those notices, 10 we affirm. 11 {2} IT IS SO ORDERED. 12 13 14 WE CONCUR: 15 16 J. MILES HANISEE, Judge 17 18 JULIE J. VARGAS, Judge M. MONICA ZAMORA, Judge
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
