Martinez v. Central Freight Lines
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date. 1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO 2 MICHAEL MARTINEZ, 3 Worker-Appellant, 4 v. NO. A-1-CA-36537 5 CENTRAL FREIGHT LINES, LLC and AIG, 6 Employer/Insurer-Appellees, 7 APPEAL FROM THE WORKERS’ COMPENSATION ADMINISTRATION 8 Leonard J. Padilla, Workers’ Compensation Judge 9 Gene N. Chavez 10 Albuquerque, NM 11 for Appellant 12 Hoffman Kelley Lopez, LLP 13 Dorielle Paull 14 Albuquerque, NM 15 for Appellees 16 17 VIGIL, Judge. MEMORANDUM OPINION 1 {1} Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of 2 proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has 3 been filed and the time for doing so has expired. 4 {2} AFFIRMED. 5 {3} IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 7 _______________________________ MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge 8 WE CONCUR: 9 ___________________________________ 10 M. MONICA ZAMORA, Judge 11 _________________________________ 12 EMIL J. KIEHNE, Judge 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
