Bank of New York Mellon v. Rodriguez
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, F/K/A THE BANK OF NEW YORK, as Successor in Interest to JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, As Trustee for RBSGC MORTGAGE LOAN TRUST MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATE, SERIES 2005-RPI, Plaintiff-Appellant, 11 v. 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 NO. A-1-CA-36317 FRANCISCO JAVIER RODRIGUEZ AND JANE DOE RODRIGUEZ, husband and wife; PATRICIA ESTRADA, if living; if deceased, THE UNKNOWN HEIRS OF PATRICIA ESTRADA, DECEASED; CITY OF ALBUQUERQUE; ABC Corporations I-X, XYZ Partnerships I-X, John Does I-X and Jane Does I-X, THE UNKNOWN HEIRS AND DEVISEES OF ANY OF THE ABOVE, IF DECEASED; OCCUPANTS OF THE PROPERTY, Defendants-Appellees. 23 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BERNALILLO COUNTY 24 Victor S. Lopez, District Judge 25 McCarthy & Holthus, LLP 26 Karen Weaver 1 Joshua T. Chappell 2 Albuquerque, NM 3 for Appellant 4 Daniel P. Dietz, Assistant City Attorney 5 Albuquerque, NM 6 for Appellee City of Albuquerque 7 MEMORANDUM OPINION 8 VANZI, Chief Judge. 9 {1} Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of 10 proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has 11 been filed and the time for doing so has expired. 12 {2} AFFIRMED. 13 {3} IT IS SO ORDERED. 14 15 __________________________________ LINDA M. VANZI, Chief Judge 16 WE CONCUR: 17 _________________________________ 18 STEPHEN G. FRENCH, Judge 19 _________________________________ 2 1 DANIEL J. GALLEGOS, Judge 3
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
