Purple Lupine, LLC v. Sherman & Sherman, P.C.
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date. 1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO 2 PURPLE LUPINE, LLC, a New Mexico 3 Limited Liability Company, 4 Plaintiff-Appellee, 5 v. No. 35,258 6 SHERMAN & SHERMAN, P.C., 7 Defendant-Appellant, 8 and 9 10 11 12 13 CITY OF DEMING, a Municipal Corporation of the State of New Mexico, SOUTHWEST LOAN & INVESTMENT CORP., SUNBELT ANDERSON OIL COMPANY, a Texas Corporation, and MINNIE LUJAN, if living, and if deceased, Minnie Lujan’s unknown heirs, 14 Defendants. 15 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF LUNA COUNTY 16 Henry R. Quintero, District Judge 17 McCarthy & Holthus, LLP 18 Jeannette Martinez Whittaker 19 Albuquerque, NM 20 for Appellee 21 Sherman & Sherman 1 Jakub F. Sherman 2 Frederick H. Sherman 3 Deming, NM 4 for Appellant 5 MEMORANDUM OPINION 6 BUSTAMANTE, Judge. 7 {1} Summary reversal was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed 8 disposition. No memorandum opposing summary reversal has been filed, and the time 9 for doing so has expired. 10 {2} Reversed. 11 {3} IT IS SO ORDERED. 12 13 14 _______________________________________ MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE, Judge 15 WE CONCUR: 16 17 JAMES J. WECHSLER, Judge 18 19 RODERICK T. KENNEDY, Judge 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
