Ortega v. Johnson
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date. 1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO 2 PHILLIP ORTEGA, 3 Plaintiff-Appellant, 4 v. NO. 34,554 5 GERALDINE C. JOHNSON, FIELD CLAIMS 6 REPRESENTATIVE and FARMERS INSURANCE 7 COMPANY OF ARIZONA, 8 Defendants-Appellees, 9 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF SANTA FE COUNTY 10 David K. Thomson, District Judge 11 Phillip Ortega 12 Santa Fe, NM 13 for Appellant 14 15 16 17 O’Brien & Ulibarri, P. C. Daniel O’Brien Justin D. Goodman Albuquerque, NM 18 for Appellees 19 20 ZAMORA, Judge. MEMORANDUM 1 {1} Plaintiff is appealing, pro se, from a district court order denying his motion for 2 entry of a default judgment, an order dismissing his complaint without prejudice, and 3 permitting him to amend his complaint. We issued a calendar notice proposing to 4 dismiss for lack of finality. Plaintiff has responded with a memorandum in opposition. 5 We dismiss the appeal. 6 {2} “[O]ur appellate jurisdiction is limited to review of any final judgment or 7 decision, any interlocutory order or decision which practically disposes of the merits 8 of the action, or any final order after entry of judgment which affects substantial 9 rights.” Capco Acquisub, Inc. v. Greka Energy Corp., 2007-NMCA-011, ¶ 17, 140 10 N.M. 920, 149 P.3d 1017 (alteration, internal quotation marks, and citation omitted)). 11 An appellate court does not have jurisdiction when a final judgment has not been 12 entered. See, e.g., State v. Griego, 2004-NMCA-107, ¶ 22, 136 N.M. 272, 96 P.3d 13 1192 (dismissing for lack of jurisdiction when no final judgment had been entered); 14 State v. Garcia, 1983-NMCA-017, ¶¶ 29-30, 99 N.M. 466, 659 P.2d 918 (same). 15 When an appellate court does not have jurisdiction, it must dismiss. See Thornton v. 16 Gamble, 1984-NMCA-093, ¶ 15, 101 N.M. 764, 688 P.2d 1268. 17 {3} This Court has previously held that an order dismissing a civil complaint 18 without prejudice is not a final, appealable order. Montoya v. Anaconda Mining Co., 19 1981-NMCA-113, ¶ 12, 97 N.M. 1, 635 P.2d 1323. In this case, Plaintiff had filed his 2 1 notice of appeal prior to the entry of the order of dismissal. [RP 34] Normally, a 2 prematurely filed notice of appeal would be considered to be timely filed on the date 3 of the entry of the final order. See Rule 12-201(A) NMRA. However, in this case, the 4 district court apparently believed that the filing of the premature notice of appeal 5 divested the district court from taking any additional action. But see Kelly Inn No. 102, 6 Inc. v. Kapnison, 1992-NMSC-005, ¶ 32, 113 N.M. 231, 824 P.2d 1033 (noting that 7 district courts retain jurisdiction to perfect appeal). As a result, the district court’s 8 order of dismissal without prejudice gave Plaintiff thirty days to amend his complaint, 9 with the period to commence upon remand from this Court. [RP 40] Because that 10 language renders the order of dismissal non-final (because the thirty day period has 11 yet to commence), we dismiss this appeal. 12 {4} IT IS SO ORDERED. 13 14 M. MONICA ZAMORA, Judge 15 WE CONCUR: 16 17 MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE, Judge 18 19 JONATHAN B. SUTIN, Judge 3
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
