Scarborough v. C&S Partnership

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date. 1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO 2 TONY SCARBOROUGH, 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NO. 34,483 C&S PARTNERSHIP; DAK PARTNERSHIP, LLC; RSC CSP, LLC; AND JOHN DOES 1, 2, 3, & 4, Defendants-Appellees. 11 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF RIO ARRIBA COUNTY 12 Francis J. Mathew, District Judge 13 Carlos Scarborough 14 Albuquerque, NM 15 for Appellant 16 Walcott & Henry PC 17 Charles V. Henry 18 Santa Fe, NM 19 for Appellees 20 21 VIGIL, Judge. MEMORANDUM OPINION 1 {1} Summary dismissal was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of 2 proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary dismissal 3 has been filed and the time for doing so has expired. 4 {2} DISMISSED. 5 {3} IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 7 _____________________________ MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Chief Judge 8 WE CONCUR: 9 ___________________________________ 10 JONATHAN B. SUTIN, Judge 11 ___________________________________ 12 M. MONICA ZAMORA, Judge 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.