State v. Garcia
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date. 1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO 2 STATE OF NEW MEXICO, 3 Plaintiff-Appellant, 4 v. NO. 34,485 5 ERIC GARCIA, 6 Defendant-Appellee. 7 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BERNALILLO COUNTY 8 Jacqueline D. Flores, District Judge 9 10 11 12 Hector H. Balderas, Attorney General Santa Fe, NM Jane A. Bernstein, Assistant Attorney General Albuquerque, NM 13 for Appellant 14 M. Naomi Salazar 15 Albuquerque, NM 16 for Appellee 17 18 GARCIA, Judge. MEMORANDUM OPINION 1 {1} Plaintiff State of New Mexico filed a docketing statement, appealing from the 2 district court’s order granting Defendant Eric Garcia’s motion to exclude drug test 3 results, entered on January 30, 2015. [DS 2–3; RP 33] This Court issued a calendar 4 notice, proposing to affirm. The State filed a response to our notice, informing this 5 Court that it “will not be filing a memorandum in opposition to the proposed summary 6 affirmance[.]” [Response 1] Accordingly, for the reasons stated in our notice of 7 proposed disposition, we affirm. 8 {2} IT IS SO ORDERED. 9 10 ________________________________ TIMOTHY L. GARCIA, Judge 11 WE CONCUR: 12 _______________________________ 13 RODERICK T. KENNEDY, Judge 14 _______________________________ 15 LINDA M. VANZI, Judge 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
