Sowards v. Biotronik
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date. 1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO 2 TOMMY SOWARDS and 3 BARBARA SOWARDS 4 Plaintiffs-Appellants, 5 v. NO. 34,373 6 BIOTRONIK, INC. and 7 EDWARD TAGUE,, 8 Defendants-Appellees. 9 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF DOÑA ANA COUNTY 10 Douglas R. Driggers, District Judge 11 12 13 14 15 McGinn, Carpenter, Montoya & Love, PA Randi McGinn Kathy Love Michael Sievers Albuquerque, NM 16 for Appellants 17 Cervantes Law Firm 18 Joseph Cervantes 19 Las Cruces, NM 1 2 3 4 Holland & Knight, LLP William F. Gould Kelly Krystyniak Washington, D.C. 5 Modrall, Sperling, Roehl, Harris & Sisk, P.A. 6 Alex C. Walker 7 Albuquerque, NM 8 for Appellee Biotronik, Inc. 9 10 11 12 Silva & Associates, P.C. Benjamin Silva, Jr. Michael Hughes Albuquerque, NM 13 for Appelle Edward Tague 14 MEMORANDUM OPINION 15 WECHSLER, Judge. 16 {1} Plaintiffs filed an appeal following the judgment entered in this case. We 17 proposed to dismiss the appeal for lack of a final, appealable order. In response, the 18 parties have filed a joint memorandum supporting the proposed dismissal. Therefore, 19 for the reasons discussed in the notice of proposed disposition, we dismiss this appeal 20 without prejudice. This Court will retain the record proper for a reasonable period of 21 time for use in any subsequent appeal that might result from this case once a final, 22 appealable order is filed. The parties are hereby ordered to notify the Court 2 1 immediately should the case be resolved in mediation or otherwise, or once the parties 2 are aware that no further appeals will be filed in this case. 3 {2} IT IS SO ORDERED. 4 5 ________________________________ JAMES J. WECHSLER, Judge 6 WE CONCUR: 7 ________________________________ 8 JONATHAN B. SUTIN, Judge 9 ________________________________ 10 RODERICK T. KENNEDY, Judge 3
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
