Wilson v. Davis
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date. 1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO 2 KENT WILSON, 3 Plaintiff-Appellee, 4 and 5 MARY WILSON, along with Kent 6 Wilson, d/b/a K&M Properties, 7 Plaintiffs, 8 v. 9 NO. 34,333 10 BETH DAVIS, 11 Defendant-Appellant, 12 and 13 RICHARD JOSEPH and HANNA 14 JOSEPH, 15 Defendants. 16 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF SAN JUAN COUNTY 17 Sandra A. Price, District Judge 1 John Westerman 2 Farmington, NM 3 for Appellee 4 Beth Davis 5 Farmington, NM 6 Pro Se Appellant 7 MEMORANDUM OPINION 8 WECHSLER, Judge. 9 {1} Summary dismissal was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of 10 proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary dismissal has 11 been filed and the time for doing so has expired. 12 {2} Accordingly, we dismiss for the reasons stated in our calendar notice. 13 {3} IT IS SO ORDERED. 14 15 __________________________________ JAMES J. WECHSLER, Judge 16 WE CONCUR: 17 _________________________________ 18 RODERICK T. KENNEDY, Judge 19 _________________________________ 2 1 TIMOTHY L. GARCIA, Judge 3
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
