Hone v. State
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date. 1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO 2 LINDA HONE, 3 Petitioner-Appellant, 4 v. NO. 34,248 5 STATE OF NEW MEXICO, 6 Respondent-Appellee. 7 IN THE MATTER OF THE 8 CONSERVATORSHIP OR 9 GUARDIANSHIP OF OSCAR HONE 10 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TAOS COUNTY 11 Sarah C. Backus, District Judge 12 Linda Hone 13 Taos, NM 14 Pro se Appellant 15 Hector H. Balderas, Attorney General 16 Santa Fe, NM 17 for Appellee 1 MEMORANDUM OPINION 2 WECHSLER, Judge. 3 {1} Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of 4 proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has 5 been filed and the time for doing so has expired. 6 {2} Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated in our calendar notice. 7 {3} IT IS SO ORDERED. 8 9 __________________________________ JAMES J. WECHSLER, Judge 10 WE CONCUR: 11 _________________________________ 12 TIMOTHY L. GARCIA, Judge 13 _________________________________ 14 J. MILES HANISEE, Judge 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
