State v. Ortega
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date. 1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO 2 STATE OF NEW MEXICO, 3 Plaintiff-Appellee, 4 v. NO. 34,203 5 JAMES A. ORTEGA, 6 Defendant-Appellant. 7 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF CHAVEZ COUNTY 8 Steven L. Bell, District Judge 9 10 11 12 Hector H. Balderas, Attorney General Santa Fe, NM Kenneth H. Stalter, Assistant Attorney General Albuquerque, NM 13 for Appellee 14 Jorge A. Alvarado, Chief Public Defender 15 Santa Fe, NM 16 for Appellant 17 18 WECHSLER, Judge. MEMORANDUM OPINION 1 {1} Defendant appeals the district court's determination that his kidnapping 2 conviction is a “serious violent offense” for the purposes of the Earned Meritorious 3 Deductions Act (EMDA), NMSA 1978, § 33-2-34 (2006). We proposed to hold that 4 the district court did not provide a sufficient basis for denying credit under the 5 EMDA. The State has responded by indicating that it opposes our calendar notice only 6 to the extent that it asks us to remand for additional factfinding on the EMDA issue, 7 if appropriate. [MIO 3] We agree that remand for reconsideration of the issue is 8 appropriate. State v. Morales, 2002-NMCA-016, ¶ 19, 131 N.M. 530, 39 P.3d 747, 9 abrogated on other grounds by State v. Frawley, 2007-NMSC–057, ¶ 36, 143 N.M. 10 7, 172 P.3d 144. 11 {2} For the reasons set forth above and in our calendar notice, we reverse the 12 EMDA determination and remand this matter to the district court pursuant to Morales. 13 14 {3} IT IS SO ORDERED. 15 16 ________________________________ JAMES J. WECHSLER, Judge 17 WE CONCUR: 18 ________________________________ 19 MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Chief Judge 2 1 ________________________________ 2 MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE, Judge 3
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
