City of Santa Fe v. Baca

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date. 1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO 2 CITY OF SANTA FE, ex rel. 3 SANTA FE POLICE DEPARTMENT, 4 Petitioner-Appellee, 5 v. NO. 34,091 6 ONE (1) 2002 TAN NISSAN FRONTIER, 7 VIN 1N6DD26S92C384983, NEW MEXICO 8 LICENSE NO. 420SLN, 9 Respondent, 10 and 11 GILBERT L. BACA and MARCO BACA, 12 Claimants-Appellants. 13 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF SANTA FE COUNTY 14 Sylvia Lamar, District Judge 15 Office of the City Attorney 16 R. Alfred Walker 17 Santa Fe, NM 18 for Appellee 19 Gilbert Baca 1 Marco Baca 2 Santa Fe, NM 3 Pro Se Appellants 4 MEMORANDUM OPINION 5 WECHSLER, Judge. 6 {1} Summary dismissal was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of 7 proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary dismissal has 8 been filed and the time for doing so has expired. 9 {2} Accordingly, we dismiss for the reasons stated in our calendar notice. 10 {3} IT IS SO ORDERED. 11 12 __________________________________ JAMES J. WECHSLER, Judge 13 WE CONCUR: 14 _________________________________ 15 MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Chief Judge 16 _________________________________ 17 RODERICK T. KENNEDY, Judge 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.