Guzman v. Rimbert
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date. 1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO 2 BELEN GUZMAN, 3 Plaintiff-Appellant, 4 v. 5 6 7 8 9 No. 34,086 JOHN ALEXANDER RIMBERT, SPRINGLEAF FINANCIAL, INC., aka BENEFICIAL FINANCE, AMERICAN GENERAL FINANCE, INC., RIO GRANDE TITLE CO., and FORD SIMMONS, 10 Defendants-Appellees, 11 and 12 SPRINGLEAF FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC., 13 Cross-Claimant/Counter-Claimant, 14 v. 15 JOHN ALEXANDER RIMBERT, 16 Cross-Defendant. 17 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BERNALILLO COUNTY 18 C. Shannon Bacon, District Judge 1 Belen Guzman 2 Albuquerque, NM 3 Pro se Appellant 4 John Alexander Rimbert 5 Albuquerque, NM 6 Pro se Appellee 7 The Simons Firm, LLP 8 Frieda Simons Burnes 9 Santa Fe, NM 10 for Appellees 11 MEMORANDUM OPINION 12 BUSTAMANTE, Judge. 13 {1} Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of 14 proposed disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed, 15 and the time for doing so has expired. 16 {2} Affirmed. 17 {3} IT IS SO ORDERED. 18 19 _______________________________________ MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE, Judge 20 WE CONCUR: 21 22 2 1 JAMES J. WECHSLER, Judge 2 3 J. MILES HANISEE, Judge 3
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
