Titus v. Titus

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date. 1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO 2 HEATHER LAVONNE TITUS, 3 Petitioner-Appellee, 4 v. No. 33,999 5 MICHAEL WAYNE TITUS, 6 Respondent-Appellant, 7 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF SAN JUAN COUNTY 8 William C. Birdsall, District Judge 9 Heather Lavonne Titus 10 West Jordan, UT 11 Pro Se Appellee 12 Michael Wayne Titus 13 Farmington, NM 14 Pro Se Appellant 15 16 BUSTAMANTE, Judge. MEMORANDUM OPINION 1 {1} Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of 2 proposed disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed, 3 and the time for doing so has expired. 4 {2} Affirmed. 5 {3} IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 7 8 _______________________________________ MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE, Judge 9 WE CONCUR: 10 11 JONATHAN B. SUTIN, Judge 12 13 LINDA M. VANZI, Judge 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.