Lester v. Lester
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date. 1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO 2 RALPH N. LESTER, 3 Plaintiff-Appellant, 4 v. No. 33,926 5 DEAN G. LESTER and KAREN LESTER, 6 Defendants-Appellees. 7 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF LEA COUNTY 8 Mark Terrence Sanchez, District Judge 9 Ralph Lester 10 Albuquerque, NM 11 Pro se Appellant 12 Dean G. Lester 13 Karen Lester 14 Ruidoso, NM 15 Pro Se Appellees 16 17 BUSTAMANTE, Judge. MEMORANDUM OPINION 1 {1} Plaintiff appeals, in a self-represented capacity, from the district court’s 2 dismissal of his case for filing a frivolous lawsuit. [RP 24, 35] Our notice proposed 3 to affirm, and Plaintiff in turn filed an “objection to proposed disposition” (objection). 4 We are unpersuaded by Plaintiff’s arguments and therefore affirm. 5 {2} We acknowledge Plaintiff’s arguments in his objection that the district court 6 should not have ruled on the case in Plaintiff’s absence [objection 1; RP 22] and that 7 the court failed “to take into . . . consideration the facts and law relating to the case.” 8 [objection 1] For the reasons discussed in our notice, however, we conclude that the 9 district court properly exercised its discretion to assess that Plaintiff’s lawsuit was 10 frivolous because Plaintiff failed to make a showing that he was entitled to his 11 requested injunctive relief [RP 1, 2-3, 13] given his failure to satisfy the “irreparable 12 injury” criteria for entitlement to injunctive relief. See generally Moody v. Stribling, 13 1999-NMCA-094, ¶ 30, 127 N.M. 630, 985 P.2d 1210 (providing that whether or not 14 to grant equitable relief is a matter left to the sound discretion of the district court); see 15 also Hines Corp. v. City of Albuquerque, 1980-NMSC-107, ¶ 13, 95 N.M. 311, 621 16 P.2d 1116 (noting that injunctive relief is granted to prevent irreparable injury for 17 which there is no adequate and complete remedy at law). In this regard, in the event 18 Plaintiff is ultimately successful in a claim that trust assets have been wrongfully 2 1 distributed or mismanaged, then he has the available remedy of securing an award of 2 monetary damages. We accordingly affirm. 3 {3} IT IS SO ORDERED. 4 5 _______________________________________ MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE, Judge 6 WE CONCUR: 7 8 M. MONICA ZAMORA, Judge 9 10 J. MILES HANISEE, Judge 3
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
