Bissey v. Morris

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date. 1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO 2 VIRGINIA BISSEY, 3 Plaintiff-Appellee, 4 v. 5 6 7 8 No. 33,855 RONNIE MORRIS and LAURA MORRIS, a/k/a LAURA BRITTON, HOWARD BRITTON, TONY BRITTON and LAUREN ASHLEY BRITTON, and ZANE MORRIS and his Wife SANDRA, 9 Defendants-Appellants, 10 and 11 [The] Unknown Spouse [of Zane Morris], if any, 12 and All Unknown Persons Who May Claim a Lien, 13 Interest or Title Adverse to the Plaintiff, 14 Defendants. 15 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF LEA COUNTY 16 William G. Schoobridge, District Judge 17 Max Houston Proctor Attorney at Law 18 Max Houston Proctor 19 Hobbs, NM 20 for Appellee 1 Ching Law Firm 2 Alexander B. Ching 3 Hobbs, NM 4 for Appellants 5 MEMORANDUM OPINION 6 BUSTAMANTE, Judge. 7 {1} Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of 8 proposed disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed, 9 and the time for doing so has expired. 10 {2} Affirmed. 11 {3} IT IS SO ORDERED. 12 13 14 _______________________________________ MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE, Judge 15 WE CONCUR: 16 17 JAMES J. WECHSLER, Judge 18 19 CYNTHIA A. FRY, Judge 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.