CSED v. May

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date. 1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO 2 STATE OF NEW MEXICO ex rel. 3 CSED/HSD, and M. SUSH MAY, 4 Petitioners-Appellees, 5 v. NO. 31,979 6 DAVID MAY, 7 Respondent-Appellant. 8 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BERNALILLO COUNTY 9 Elizabeth E. Whitefield, District Judge 10 CSED/HSD 11 Betsy R. Salcedo 12 Albuquerque, NM 13 for Appellee Human Services Department 14 David Foster Law Firm 15 David R. Foster 16 Santa Fe, NM 17 for Appellee M. Sush May 18 La Morena Law, LLC 19 Elena Moreno Hansen 20 Albuquerque, NM 1 for Appellant 2 MEMORANDUM OPINION 3 KENNEDY, Judge. 4 Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of 5 proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has 6 been filed, and the time for doing so has expired. 7 AFFIRMED. 8 IT IS SO ORDERED. 9 10 _______________________________ RODERICK T. KENNEDY, Judge 11 WE CONCUR: 12 _________________________ 13 CYNTHIA A. FRY, Judge 14 _________________________ 15 MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.