Moya v. Doporto

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date. 1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO 2 JESSICA RENEE MOYA, 3 Petitioner-Appellant, 4 v. NO. 31,908 5 DANIEL AMOS DOPORTO, 6 Respondent-Appellee. 7 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF EDDY COUNTY 8 Jane Shuler Gray, District Judge 9 Ching Law Firm 10 Alexander B. Ching 11 Hobbs, NM 12 for Appellant 13 McCormick, Caraway, Tabor & Byers, LLP 14 Susan M. Cuddy-Moore 15 Carlsbad, NM 16 for Appellee 17 MEMORANDUM OPINION 18 VIGIL, Judge. 19 Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of 20 proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has 1 been filed and the time for doing so has expired. 2 AFFIRMED. 3 IT IS SO ORDERED. 4 5 _______________________________ MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge 6 WE CONCUR: 7 _________________________________ 8 JAMES J. WECHSLER, Judge 9 _________________________________ 10 RODERICK T. KENNEDY, Judge 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.