Stewart v. Stewart

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date. 1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO 2 HONEY STEWART, 3 Petitioner-Appellee, 4 v. No. 31,579 5 JOHN MICHAEL STEWART, 6 Respondent-Appellant. 7 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF McKINLEY COUNTY 8 Louis E. Depauli, Jr., District Judge 9 Rabb & Beal PLLC 10 Lloyd Rabb, III 11 Tucson, AZ 12 for Appellee 13 John Michael Stewart 14 Gallup, NM 15 Pro se Appellant 16 17 BUSTAMANTE, Judge. MEMORANDUM OPINION 1 Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of 2 proposed disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed, 3 and the time for doing so has expired. 4 Affirmed. 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 7 MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE, Judge 8 WE CONCUR: 9 10 CELIA FOY CASTILLO, Chief Judge 11 12 JAMES J. WECHSLER, Judge 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.