State v. Murray
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date. IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO STATE OF NEW MEXICO, 10 Plaintiff-Appellee, 11 v. NO. 30,998 12 PAUL MURRAY, 13 Defendant-Appellant. 14 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF EDDY COUNTY 15 Richard J. Brown, District Judge 16 Gary K. King, Attorney General 17 Santa Fe, NM 18 for Appellee 19 Shawn J. Lunsford 20 Carlsbad, NM 21 for Appellant 22 MEMORANDUM OPINION 23 VIGIL, Judge. 24 Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of 25 proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has 26 been filed and the time for doing so has expired. 2 1 AFFIRMED. 2 IT IS SO ORDERED. 3 4 _______________________________ MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge 5 WE CONCUR: 6 _________________________________ 7 CYNTHIA A. FRY, Judge 8 _________________________________ 9 LINDA M. VANZI, Judge 3
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
