Human Services Dept v. Pekarcik
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date. IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO 7 STATE OF NEW MEXICO ex rel. 8 HUMAN SERVICES DEPARTMENT 9 and ROBERTA PEKARCIK, 10 Petitioners-Appellees, 11 v. NO. 30,744 12 PHILIP PEKARCIK, 13 Respondent-Appellant. 14 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF SANTA FE COUNTY 15 David K. Thomson, District Judge 16 McDevitt Law Firm, P.A. 17 Susan Schaefer McDevitt 18 Santa Fe, NM 19 for Appellee 20 Philip Pekarcik 21 Los Lunas, NM 22 Pro Se Appellant 23 24 VIGIL, Judge. MEMORANDUM OPINION 1 Summary reversal was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed 2 summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary reversal has been filed 3 and the time for doing so has expired. 4 REVERSED. 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 7 _______________________________ MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge 8 WE CONCUR: 9 _________________________________ 10 MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE, Judge 11 _________________________________ 12 TIMOTHY L. GARCIA, Judge 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
