State v. Valenzuela

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

1 2 3 4 5 6 This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date. IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO 7 STATE OF NEW MEXICO, 8 Plaintiff-Appellee, 9 v. NO. 30,626 10 KAREN VALENZUELA, 11 Defendant-Appellant. 12 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF DOÃ A ANA COUNTY 13 Fernando R. Macias, District Judge 14 Gary K. King, Attorney General 15 Santa Fe, NM 16 for Appellee 17 Pro Se Party 18 Santa Fe, NM 19 for Appellant 20 MEMORANDUM OPINION 21 KENNEDY, Judge. 22 Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of 23 proposed disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed, 1 and the time for doing so has expired. 2 AFFIRMED. 3 IT IS SO ORDERED. 4 5 ___________________________________ RODERICK T. KENNEDY, Judge 6 WE CONCUR: 7 ___________________________ 8 JONATHAN B. SUTIN, Judge 9 ___________________________ 10 CYNTHIA A. FRY, Judge 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.