State v. Thorn

Annotate this Case

483 P.2d 312 (1971)

82 N.M. 431

STATE of New Mexico, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Douglas R. THORN, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 547.

Court of Appeals of New Mexico.

March 12, 1971.

Fred T. Hensley, Portales, for appellant.

James A. Maloney, Atty. Gen., Santa Fe, Thomas L. Dunigan, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

OPINION

SUTIN, Judge.

Thorn pleaded guilty to possession of marijuana under § 54-7-13, N.M.S.A. 1953 (Repl. Vol. 8, pt. 2). This is the general *313 narcotics law which contains a mandatory sentence provision. Under State v. Riley, 82 N.M. 235, 478 P.2d 563 (1970), and State v. Rendleman (Ct.App.) 82 N.M. 346, 481 P.2d 708, decided February 12, 1971, the conviction and sentence is reversed.

At the hearings, in connection with the above charge, the trial court expressed the point of view that the state had the option of proceeding under the general statute, or the special statute which is § 54-5-14, N.M.S.A. 1953 (Repl. Vol. 8, pt. 2). Thorn's appeal contends it was error to charge him under the general statute. We agree.

The rule fixed in Riley applies to the Thorn case.

The judgment and sentence of Thorn in the trial court is reversed. The cause is remanded with instructions to vacate the judgment and sentence and dismiss the charge under which Thorn pleaded guilty.

It is so ordered.

SPIESS, C.J., and WOOD, J., concur.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.