State v. Finkle
Annotate this Case66 N.J. 139 (1974)
329 A.2d 65
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. HAROLD FINKLE, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
The Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Argued November 18, 1974.
Decided December 4, 1974.
Mr. Harold Finkle, of the New York Bar, argued the cause for appellant (Mr. Morgan E. Thomas, attorney).
Mr. Robert A. Rubenfeld, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent (Mr. William F. Hyland, Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney).
PER CURIAM.
The judgment is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed by the Appellate Division. 128 N.J. Super. 199.
CLIFFORD, J., concurs in the result.
For affirmance Chief Justice HUGHES, Justices JACOBS, MOUNTAIN, SULLIVAN, PASHMAN, CLIFFORD and Judge COLLESTER 7.
For reversal None.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
