Schramm v. ARSENAL ESSO
Annotate this Case63 N.J. 593 (1973)
311 A.2d 178
BERTHA SCHRAMM AND GEORGE SCHRAMM, PLAINTIFFS'-RESPONDENTS, v. ARSENAL ESSO STATION, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT, AND KRAUSZER'S VENDING, INC., DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
The Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Argued November 5, 1973.
Decided November 20, 1973.
Mr. Herbert Klein argued the cause for appellant Krauszer's Vending, Inc. (Messrs. Krieger and Klein, attorneys; Mr. William J. Pollinger on the brief).
Mr. Philip M. Lustbader argued the cause for respondent Arsenal Esso Station. (Philip M. Lustbader, David Lustbader, a Professional Corporation, attorneys).
PER CURIAM.
The judgment is affirmed substantally for the reasons expressed by the Appellate Division. Schramm v. Arsenal Esso Station and Krauszer's Vending, Inc., reported at 124 N.J. Super. 135 (App. Div. 1973).
For affirmance Justices JACOBS, HALL, SULLIVAN, PASHMAN and CLIFFORD and Judge CONFORD 6.
Opposed None.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
