Greenfield v. Dusseault

Annotate this Case

33 N.J. 78 (1960)

161 A.2d 475

JACK GREENFIELD, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. ROBERT DUSSEAULT, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued June 7, 1960.

Decided June 13, 1960.

Mr. John J. O'Donnell argued the cause for the appellant (Messrs. Egan, O'Donnell & Hanley, attorneys).

Mr. Sam Weiss argued the cause for the respondent (Mr. Jacob Siegal, attorney).

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed essentially for the reasons expressed in the majority opinion of Judge Freund in the court below.

BURLING, J., concurring in result.

For affirmance Chief Justice WEINTRAUB, and Justices BURLING, JACOBS, FRANCIS, PROCTOR, HALL and SCHETTINO 7.

For reversal None.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.