Fairclough v. Baumgartner

Annotate this Case

8 N.J. 187 (1951)

84 A.2d 545

ELMER FAIRCLOUGH AND MARTHA FAIRCLOUGH, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. HERMAN BAUMGARTNER AND THERESA BAUMGARTNER, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued November 12, 1951.

Decided November 19, 1951.

*190 Mr. J. Mortimer Rubenstein argued the cause for the appellants (Mr. Milton Schamach, attorney).

Mr. I. Arthur Weiss argued the cause for the respondents (Messrs. Weiss & Weiss, attorneys).

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Grimshaw.

For affirmance Chief Justice VANDERBILT, and Justices CASE, OLIPHANT, WACHENFELD, BURLING and ACKERSON 6.

For reversal None.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.