GLENNY DIAZ v. THURAI KUGAN
Annotate this CaseNOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." Although it is posted on the internet, this opinion is binding only on the parties in the case and its use in other cases is limited. R. 1:36-3. SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3288-19 GLENNY DIAZ, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. THURAI KUGAN and BRENNA P. KUGAN, Defendants-Appellants. __________________________ Argued September 28, 2021 – Decided November 9, 2021 Before Judges Messano and Enright. On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Middlesex County, Docket No. L-6953-17. Thomas W. Matthews argued the cause for appellants (Soriano, Henkel, Biehl & Matthews, attorneys; Thomas W. Matthews, of counsel and on the briefs). John R. Gorman argued the cause for respondents (Lutz, Shafranski, Gorman & Mahoney, PA, attorneys; John R. Gorman, of counsel and on the brief; Randi S. Greenberg, on the brief). PER CURIAM This matter having been amicably adjusted and the parties having stipulated to the dismissal of this appeal, it is hereby ordered that the appeal is dismissed with prejudice and without costs. A-3288-19 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.