ROSENTHAL & ROSENTHAL, INC v. VANESSA BENUN
Annotate this CaseNOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE
APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION
This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although it is posted on the internet, this opinion is binding only on the parties in the case and its use in other cases is limited. R.1:36-3.
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY
APPELLATE DIVISION
DOCKET NO. A-0
ROSENTHAL & ROSENTHAL, INC.,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
VANESSA BENUN, a/k/a VANESSA
BROOCHIAN and ELAN BROOCHIAN,
Defendants,
and
RIKER, DANZIG, SCHERER, HYLAND
& PERRETTI, LLP,
Defendant-Respondent.
_______________________________
August 2, 2017
Submitted November 30, 2016 Decided
Before Judges Fuentes and Simonelli.
On appeal from Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division, Monmouth County, Docket No. F-6301-12.
McElroy Deutsch Mulvaney & Carpenter, LLP, attorneys for appellant (Joshua A. Zielinski and Peter Saad, of counsel and on the briefs; Andrew Gimigliano, on the briefs).
Riker, Danzig, Scherer, Hyland & Perretti, LLP, respondent pro se (Nicholas Racioppi, Jr., of counsel; Matthew H. Lewis and Michael Crowley, on the brief).
PER CURIAM
We have been advised that this matter has been amicably adjusted and the parties have stipulated to the dismissal of this appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.