KAMIE KENDALL v. HOFFMAN-LA ROCHE, INC
Annotate this CaseNOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE
APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY
APPELLATE DIVISION
DOCKET NO. A-0
KAMIE KENDALL,
Plaintiff-Respondent,
v.
HOFFMAN-LA ROCHE, INC. and
ROCHE LABORATORIES INC.,
Defendants-Appellants.
____________________________________
June 16, 2016
Argued February 8, 2016 Decided
Before Judges Sabatino, Accurso and Suter.
On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Atlantic County, Docket No. L-8213-05.
Paul W. Schmidt (Covington & Burling, LLP) of the New York and District of Columbia bars, admitted pro hac vice, argued the cause for appellants (Gibbons P.C. and Mr. Schmidt, attorneys; Michelle M. Bufano and Mr. Schmidt, of counsel and on the briefs.)
David R. Buchanan argued the cause for respondents (Seeger Weiss, LLP, attorneys; Mr. Buchanan, Mary Jane Bass (Beggs & Lane) of the Florida bar, admitted pro hac vice, and Michael D. Hook (Hook Bolton) of the Florida bar, admitted pro hac vice, on the brief).
PER CURIAM
The court is advised that the matter has been amicably resolved, the parties have stipulated to the dismissal of the appeal, and the appeal is dismissed without prejudice and without costs.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.