New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division - Unpublished Opinions Decisions 2015
Opinions 2001 - 2014 of 2014
STOCK ENTERPRISES INC v. GOVERNING BODY OF THE BOROUGH OF SAYREVILLE
Date: January 5, 2015
Docket Number: a5940-12
Date: January 5, 2015
Docket Number: a5940-12
NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY v. F.M.
Date: January 2, 2015
Docket Number: a1393-13
Date: January 2, 2015
Docket Number: a1393-13
NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY v. F.M.
Date: January 2, 2015
Docket Number: a1394-13 PER CURIAM After fact-finding hearings in this Title 9 case, Judge Kimarie Rahill concluded that both F.M. ("the father") and L.M. ("the mother") had committed abuse or neglect of their two daughters, J.M. ("Jenny")1 and C.M. ("Chrissy"). The court found that the parents engaged in multiple acts of domestic violence with one another in the children's proximity or presence, which resulted in psychological harm to the children substantiated by expert proof. Both parents now appeal. The Law Guardian joins with the Division of Child Protection & Permanency ("the Division") in opposing the appeals, which have been consolidated.
Date: January 2, 2015
Docket Number: a1394-13 PER CURIAM After fact-finding hearings in this Title 9 case, Judge Kimarie Rahill concluded that both F.M. ("the father") and L.M. ("the mother") had committed abuse or neglect of their two daughters, J.M. ("Jenny")1 and C.M. ("Chrissy"). The court found that the parents engaged in multiple acts of domestic violence with one another in the children's proximity or presence, which resulted in psychological harm to the children substantiated by expert proof. Both parents now appeal. The Law Guardian joins with the Division of Child Protection & Permanency ("the Division") in opposing the appeals, which have been consolidated.
The opinions published on Justia State Caselaw are sourced from individual state court sites.
These court opinions may not be the official published versions, and you should check your local court rules before citing to them.
We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site,
or the information linked to on the state site.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.