NEW JERSEY REAL ESTATE COMMISSION v. DOUGLAS R. TONGE

Annotate this Case

NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE

APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION

 

SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY

APPELLATE DIVISION

DOCKET NO. A-0



NEW JERSEY REAL ESTATE

COMMISSION,


Complainant-Respondent,


v.


DOUGLAS R. TONGE,


Respondent-Appellant.


_______________________________

October 30, 2013

 

Argued October 17, 2013 Decided


Before Judges Fuentes, Simonelli and Fasciale.


On appeal from the New Jersey Real Estate

Commission, Department of Banking and

Insurance, Docket No. MER-05-018.


Douglas R. Tonge, appellant, argued the cause

pro se.


William B. Puskas, Jr., Deputy Attorney General,

argued the cause for respondent (John J. Hoffman,

Acting Attorney General, attorney; Lewis A.

Scheindlin, Assistant Attorney General, of counsel;

Mr. Puskas, on the brief.


PER CURIAM


On October 18, 2010, the New Jersey Real Estate Commission (NJREC or Commission) found appellant Douglas R. Tonge and his company Just New Homes, Inc., violated N.J.S.A. 45:15-17(k) by paying rebates or compensation to persons not licensed by the Commission; N.J.A.C. 11:5-6.4(a), breached the fiduciary duty owed to their customers; N.J.S.A. 45:15-17(e), failed to deal fairly with all parties; and N.J.A.C. 11:5-6.1(r), made false or misleading statements in promotional materials.

The Commission: (1) revoked Tonge's real estate broker license for five years; (2) imposed a $500 fine for each of the 247 violations under N.J.S.A. 45:15-17(k), for a total monetary sanction of $123,500; (3) directed Tonge to pay the fines within one year of the final order; and (4) conditioned the restoration of his license upon the completion of the five-year revocation period and the full payment of all monetary sanctions. Tonge appealed the Commission's decision to this court. New Jersey Real Estate Commission v. Douglas R. Tonge and Just New Homes, Inc., No. A-01648-10 (App. Div. October 30, 2013).

While the appeal challenging the Commission's decision was pending before another panel of this court, Tonge requested the Commission to stay the execution of the sanctions imposed on October 18, 2010, until the appeal was decided. The Commission denied Tonge's application for a stay.

In this appeal, Tonge seeks an order from this court reversing the Commission's decision to deny the stay. Because our opinion upholding the Commission's disciplinary findings and sanctions has been filed and released to the parties and placed as an unpublished opinion on the judiciary's website simultaneously with this opinion, the issue raised by Tonge here is now moot.

Appeal dismissed.

 

 

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.