ROSEMARY MUGLIA v. GIACOMO VIRONE

Annotate this Case

NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE

APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION

 

SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY

APPELLATE DIVISION

DOCKET NO. A-0


ROSEMARY AND RICHARD MUGLIA,


Plaintiffs-Respondents,


v.


GIACOMO VIRONE,


Defendant-Appellant.

___________________________________

September 30, 2013

 

Submitted September 18, 2013 Decided

 

Before Judges Fuentes, Simonelli and Haas.

 

On appeal from Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Middlesex County, Docket No. L-8282-10.

 

Hoagland, Longo, Moran, Dunst & Doukas, L.L.P., attorneys for appellant (Richard J. Mirra, of counsel and on the brief).

 

Hobbie, Corrigan & Bertucio, P.C., attorneys for respondent Rosemary Muglia (Jacqueline DeCarlo, on the brief).


PER CURIAM


We have been advised that this matter has been amicably adjusted and the parties have stipulated to the dismissal of this appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.