SPIEZLE ARCHITECTURAL GROUP INC v. GREEN BROOK TOWNSHIP BOARD OF EDUCATION
Annotate this CaseNOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE
APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY
APPELLATE DIVISION
DOCKET NO. A-6044-09T1
SPIEZLE ARCHITECTURAL GROUP,
INC.,
Plaintiff-Respondent,
v.
GREEN BROOK TOWNSHIP BOARD OF
EDUCATION,
Defendant-Appellant,
v.
SPIEZLE ARCHITECTURAL GROUP,
INC.,
Third-Party Plaintiff-
Respondent/Cross-Appellant,
v.
MORRIS JOHNSON & ASSOCIATES,
INC.,
Third-Party Defendant/
Cross-Respondent.
______________________________________
March 18, 2011
Submitted March 9, 2011 - Decided
Before Judges Fuentes, Ashrafi and Nugent.
On appeal from Superior Court of New Jersey,
Law Division, Somerset County, Docket No.
L-391-08.
Schwartz Simon Edelstein & Celso, attorneys
for appellant Green Brook Township Board of
Education (Stephen J. Edelstein, of counsel;
Nuris E. Portuondo, on the brief).
Hoagland, Longo, Moran, Dunst & Doukas, attorneys
for respondent/cross-appellant Spiezle Architectural
Group, Inc. (Joan Howell Osborne, of counsel and
on the brief).
Suarez & Suarez, attorneys for cross-respondent
Morris Johnson & Associates (Michael D. Suarez,
of counsel; Allan B. Thompson, on the brief).
PER CURIAM
We have been advised prior to argument that this matter has been amicably adjusted and the parties have stipulated to the dismissal of this appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.