SPIEZLE ARCHITECTURAL GROUP INC v. GREEN BROOK TOWNSHIP BOARD OF EDUCATION

Annotate this Case


NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE

APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION

 

SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY

APPELLATE DIVISION

DOCKET NO. A-6044-09T1


SPIEZLE ARCHITECTURAL GROUP,

INC.,


Plaintiff-Respondent,


v.


GREEN BROOK TOWNSHIP BOARD OF

EDUCATION,


Defendant-Appellant,


v.



SPIEZLE ARCHITECTURAL GROUP,

INC.,


Third-Party Plaintiff-

Respondent/Cross-Appellant,


v.


MORRIS JOHNSON & ASSOCIATES,

INC.,

Third-Party Defendant/

Cross-Respondent.


______________________________________

March 18, 2011

 

Submitted March 9, 2011 - Decided


Before Judges Fuentes, Ashrafi and Nugent.


On appeal from Superior Court of New Jersey,

Law Division, Somerset County, Docket No.

L-391-08.


Schwartz Simon Edelstein & Celso, attorneys

for appellant Green Brook Township Board of

Education (Stephen J. Edelstein, of counsel;

Nuris E. Portuondo, on the brief).


Hoagland, Longo, Moran, Dunst & Doukas, attorneys

for respondent/cross-appellant Spiezle Architectural

Group, Inc. (Joan Howell Osborne, of counsel and

on the brief).


Suarez & Suarez, attorneys for cross-respondent

Morris Johnson & Associates (Michael D. Suarez,

of counsel; Allan B. Thompson, on the brief).


PER CURIAM


We have been advised prior to argument that this matter has been amicably adjusted and the parties have stipulated to the dismissal of this appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed with prejudice and without costs.



Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.